Guide

MFA Comparison Guide

A buyer-friendly guide for choosing better MFA controls without treating every method as equal.

Preview before download

Choose MFA by risk tier, not by checkbox coverage

The guide compares common factors by phishing resistance, recovery weakness, support impact, and fit for administrators, finance, executives, and general users.

Sample decisions
  • Use passkeys or FIDO2 security keys for users with administrative, financial, or sensitive-data access.
  • Treat authenticator apps as a workable workforce baseline, not the final answer for privileged roles.
  • Review help desk recovery and enrollment controls before calling any MFA rollout complete.
Common mistakes
  • Treating SMS, push, TOTP, security keys, and passkeys as equivalent because all count as MFA.
  • Rolling out better factors without backup-factor and lost-device procedures.
  • Ignoring support desk reset workflows that can bypass the primary authenticator.
What is inside

DefendArm MFA Comparison Guide

Download a concise MFA comparison guide covering SMS, authenticator apps, push, security keys, passkeys, and recovery controls.

Fillable PDF. Reviewed 2026-09-21. Includes practical guidance and reusable review records.

  • SMS OTP is easy to deploy but weak against SIM swap and real-time phishing.
  • Authenticator app TOTP improves baseline security but remains phishable.
  • Push MFA needs number matching and fatigue controls.
  • FIDO2 security keys provide strong phishing resistance for high-risk users.
  • Passkeys can improve usability and phishing resistance when recovery controls are mature.
  • Recovery workflows, enrollment controls, and administrator exceptions often decide real-world strength.

Questions and answers

Who should use the MFA Comparison Guide?

This resource is built for IT leaders, identity owners, risk teams who need a clear way to turn security guidance into owners, evidence, and next actions.

What should a team prepare before using it?

Prepare current system owners, relevant policies, available logs or configuration evidence, and any known exceptions that affect the control area.

When should this turn into a deeper review?

Bring in the relevant specialist when the work exposes missing evidence, unclear authority, or controls your team cannot validate. Keep the unresolved issue, owner, and next decision recorded.